Welcome to FIS   Sponsored By
Subscribe to FIS | Register with FIS | Advertise with FIS | Newsletter | About FIS | Contact us
   


Moroccan fishing boats. (Photo: Terje Engoe / Copyright: FIS)

CJEU validates fisheries agreement with Morocco, but excludes Western Sahara

EUROPEAN UNION
Tuesday, February 27, 2018, 21:50 (GMT + 9)

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concluded today that the Fisheries Agreement celebrated between the EU and Morocco is valid in so far
as it is not applicable to Western Sahara and to its adjacent waters.

This ruling contradicts the previous conclusions of the general counsel of the CJEU, Melchior Wathelet, who in January said that the agreement should be declared invalid because it involves the Western Sahara region.

The case was brought to the The Court of Justice of the European Union by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in response to the complaint filed by the Western Sahara Campaign (WSC).

In today’s judgment, the Court holds, in the first place, that it has jurisdiction to assess the validity of acts approving the conclusion of international agreements concluded by the EU, and to assess whether such agreements are compatible with the treaties and the rules of international law which bind the EU.

The Court examines, in the second place, that the Fisheries Agreement is applicable to the "territory of Morocco", an expression equivalent to the concept of "territory of the Kingdom of Morocco" in the Association Agreement.

As the Court has previously held in its judgment of 21 December 2016, that concept itself refers to the geographical area over which the Kingdom of Morocco exercises its sovereign powers under international law, to the exclusion of any other territory, such as that of Western Sahara. In those circumstances, if the territory of Western Sahara were to be included within the scope of the Fisheries Agreement, that would be contrary to certain rules of general international law that are applicable in relations between the EU and Kingdom of Morocco, inter alia the principle of self-determination.

The Court notes that the Fisheries Agreement is applicable to "waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction" of the Kingdom of Morocco. It explains that in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the waters over which a coastal State is entitled to exercise sovereignty or jurisdiction are limited exclusively to the waters adjacent to its territory and forming part of its territorial sea or of its exclusive economic zone. The Court therefore holds that, taking account of the fact that the territory of Western Sahara does not form part of the territory of the Kingdom of Morocco, the waters adjacent to the territory of Western Sahara are not part of the Moroccan fishing zone referred to in the Fisheries Agreement.

Lastly, the Court examines the territorial scope of the Protocol to the Fisheries Agreement. In this regard, it notes that although that Protocol does not contain any specific provisions on that subject, the Court states that several of its provisions use the expression "Moroccan fishing zone". That expression is the same as that to be found in the Fisheries Agreement, which defines it as "waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Kingdom of Morocco".

The Court concludes that the "Moroccan fishing zone" under the Protocol does not include the waters adjacent to the territory of Western Sahara.

The CJEU therefore holds that, since neither the Fisheries Agreement nor the Protocol thereto are applicable to the waters adjacent to the territory of Western Sahara, the EU acts relating to their conclusion and implementation are valid.

The fisheries protocol between the EU and Rabat entered into force in February 2007 for a period of four years and was renewed twice, the last time in 2013. The current agreement expires in July of this year, and the EU governments They agreed last week to start negotiations with Morocco to renew it.

The agreement allows access to Moroccan waters to some 126 community vessels from 11 EU countries, among which Spain is the most benefited Member State.

Related articles:

- Euro-Moroccan commission relies on favorable ruling by CJEU on EU-Morocco fishing agreement
- EU-Morocco fisheries agreement should be declared invalid, according to legal adviser

[email protected]
www.fis.com


 Print


Click to know how to advertise in FIS
MORE NEWS
Spain
Jan 19, 00:10 (GMT + 9):
Minister says Spain is ready to minimize 'Brexit' impact in fisheries sector
Australia
Jan 18, 23:50 (GMT + 9):
Austral Fisheries will use revolutionary blockchain platform to track its toothfish
Argentina
Jan 18, 23:10 (GMT + 9):
Global change could affect hake fisheries in Tierra del Fuego
United States
Jan 18, 23:00 (GMT + 9):
Four companies participate in 'fish-free' fish oil challenge
Mexico
Jan 18, 22:00 (GMT + 9):
Tuna fishing season begins in the Pacific Ocean
Peru
Jan 18, 21:30 (GMT + 9):
Jack mackerel and mackerel catch limits set for 2019
Ecuador
Jan 18, 20:30 (GMT + 9):
In search of greater power within the tuna market
United States
Jan 18, 02:50 (GMT + 9):
Lobster processor to close its plant in Connecticut
Mexico
Jan 18, 02:30 (GMT + 9):
Creation of state fisheries and aquaculture councils promoted
Australia
Jan 18, 02:30 (GMT + 9):
Threats to access small resources concern the sector
Peru
Jan 18, 01:30 (GMT + 9):
Camposol's subsidiary to strengthen shrimp production
New Zealand
Jan 18, 01:20 (GMT + 9):
IN BRIEF - What does marine heatwave mean for future of New Zealand's fish?
Australia
Jan 18, 01:10 (GMT + 9):
IN BRIEF - Lobster wars continue as government claims extra catches kept by fishers themselves
United States
Jan 18, 01:00 (GMT + 9):
IN BRIEF - After 20 years and $1 billion spent on Washington state salmon programs, fish still declining, new report says
United Kingdom
Jan 18, 00:50 (GMT + 9):
IN BRIEF - Seaside town divided over Britain’s Brexit turmoil



Lenguaje
FEATURED EVENTS
  
TOP STORIES
Galician fleet prepares to start squid fishing in Falklands
Spain The Galician fleet that works in Falkland waters is already preparing to leave for the South Atlantic fishing ground, before the next opening of Loligo squid fishery.
Shrimp fishing and sale prohibited for two months
Mozambique Mozambique fishing authorities announced that the fishing and sale of shrimp caught in the waters of the country will be prohibited for two months, in order to allow the recovery of stocks and preserve the resource.
Proposal to regulate tuna and bonito fishing
Panama A draft bill that has been submitted for the consideration of the National Assembly seeks to protect tuna and bonito resources by regulating the use of purse seines.
Staff shortage drives local company to process crabs in Vietnam
United Kingdom Blue Sea Food Company, based in Paington, England, will send crabs caught in UK to Asia, since it does not enough staff in the country.
 
Maruha Nichiro Corporation
Nichirei Corporation - Headquarters
Pesquera El Golfo S.A.
Ventisqueros - Productos del Mar Ventisqueros S.A
Wärtsilä Corporation -Wartsila Group Headquarter-
ITOCHU Corporation -Headquarter-
BAADER - Nordischer Maschinenbau Rud. Baader GmbH+Co.KG (Head Office)
Inmarsat plc - Global Headquarters
Marks & Spencer
Tesco PLC (Supermarket) - Headquarters
Sea Harvest Corporation (PTY) Ltd. - Group Headquarters
I&J - Irvin & Johnson Holding Company (Pty) Ltd.
Blue Continent Products (Pty) Ltd - (Oceana Group Limited)
Pesquera San Jose S.A.
Nutreco N.V. - Head Office
CNFC China National Fisheries Corporation - Group Headquarters
W. van der Zwan & Zn. B.V.
SMMI - Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Co., Ltd. - Headquarters
Icicle Seafoods, Inc
Starkist Seafood Co. - Headquearters
Trident Seafoods Corp.
American Seafoods Group LLC - Head Office
Marel - Group Headquarters
SalMar ASA - Group Headquarters
Sajo Industries Co., Ltd
Hansung Enterprise Co.,Ltd.
BIM - Irish Sea Fisheries Board (An Bord Iascaigh Mhara)
CEFAS - Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science
COPEINCA ASA - Corporacion Pesquera Inca S.A.C.
Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd.
VASEP - Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters & Producers
Gomes da Costa
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
NISSUI - Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd. - Group Headquarters
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization - Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Headquarter)
Hagoromo Foods Co., Ltd.
Koden Electronics Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
A.P. Møller - Maersk A/S - Headquarters
BVQI - Bureau Veritas Quality International (Head Office)
UPS - United Parcel Service, Inc. - Headquarters
Hamburg Süd Group - (Headquearters)
Armadora Pereira S.A. - Group Headquarters
NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Headquarters)
Omega Protein Corporation
Marona S.A.
Mowi ASA (formerly Marine Harvest ASA) - Headquarters
Marubeni Europe Plc -UK-
Findus Ltd
Icom Inc. (Headquarter)
WWF Centroamerica
Oceana Group Limited
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. - Headquarters
Friosur S.A. - Headquarters
Cargill, Incorporated - Global Headquarters
Benihana Inc.
Leardini Pescados Ltda
Mitsubishi Corporation Marine Products Depts. D.Team
CJ Corporation  - Group Headquarters
Greenpeace International - The Netherlands | Headquarters
David Suzuki Foundation
Fisheries and Oceans Canada -Communications Branch-
Mitsui & Co.,Ltd - Headquarters
NOREBO Group (former Ocean Trawlers Group)
Natori Co., Ltd.
Carrefour Supermarket - Headquarters
FedEx Corporation - Headquarters
AKBM - Aker BioMarine ASA
Seafood Choices Alliance -Headquarter-
Austevoll Seafood ASA
Walmart / Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Supermarket) -Headquarter-
New Japan Radio Co.Ltd (JRC) -Head Office-
Gulfstream JSC
INVE Group - Head Office
Marine Stewardship Council - MSC Worldwide Headquarters
Royal Dutch Shell plc (Headquarter)
Genki Sushi Co.,Ltd -Headquarter-
Iceland Pelagic ehf
AXA Assistance Argentina S.A.
Caterpillar Inc. - Headquarters
Tiger Brands Limited
Morpol ASA - Group Headquarters
SeaChoice
National Geographic Society
AmazonFresh, LLC - AmazonFresh

Copyright 1995 - 2019 Fish Info & Services Co.Ltd| All Rights Reserved.   DISCLAIMER